Umar Sa’ad Hassan: Why we must avoid a treadmill war against corruption

The Anti-Corruption war has gathered momentum and the willpower of the government is most commendable.

We have transited from probes that lead no where exactly; in other words, ones that die the ‘Nigerian death’ to ones that end with immediate prosecution of those found wanting.

However, we must proceed from this point with extreme caution as the determination to see those who have looted us punished could turn out counter-productive if
the requisite expertise is not applied in handling corruption cases.

If at the right time, we sit down to evaluate our performance in this war, we wouldn’t only be counting convictions but also how much we let slip through our grasp. We must avoid a treadmill war against corruption; which in essence means running forward but on the same spot.

The EFCC arraigned Chief Raymond Dokpesi on Tuesday 8th December 2015 on a 6 count charge bordering round the receipt of N2.1 Billion for media/publicity of the Presidential campaign of the PDP with Attahiru Bafarawa reportedly set to follow.

While I am not disputing the fact that government funds may have been given to people like Dokpesi and Bafarawa, I am worried about the chances of securing convictions against them. One need not be a legal luminary to know you can hardly prove wrongdoing against a man who received money for unspecified purposes as there is no law requiring him to turn down monetary gifts or ascertain the accounts they emanated from before receiving.

Attahiru Bafarawa’s son is alleged to have received money on his behalf for no stated reason. I’ll try to depict my fears in the simplest of ways. His son, Sagir was sitting on his sofa at home watching a soccer game when he received an alert from his bank that he had been transferred N1.5 Billion.

If the depositor’s name doesn’t read Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), then the EFCC has a lame case against him. It would be most difficult to prove any wrong doing on his part. It is important to note on the other hand that Chief Raymond Dokpesi allegedly entered into a contract with President Jonathan or the PDP and
not the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Similarly, if the details of the transfer don’t expressly state that payment into his First Bank Plc account was from the ONSA, then we have a problem.’Knowledge’ or mens rea; the mental element is a key ingredient in the commission of a crime and by this I don’t mean knowledge that what they were doing was wrong as ignorance of
the law is no defence.

If it can’t be proved that the Accused persons/suspects knew that the money they received were public funds, then we would be shooting at shadows. Without completely ruling such out, I find it a little too hard to believe (without full knowledge of the evidence against him), that a seasoned ex-serviceman like Col. Sambo Dasuki (Rtd) would transfer money from his office account to private individuals in commercial banks.

Even not for anything but for the fact that he fully understands the drastic consequences of a leak in any of the banks. A scandal of that nature involving the NSA would be most embarrassing to the Government he represents.

As much as I would want to see every thief who has stolen from us pay for doing so, there are cases where it would be in our best interests to exploit other means outside the courtroom. Our most skilled interrogators must be deployed in cases where the EFCC wouldn’t win in court in place of high price Senior Advocates of Nigeria.

The right bluffs and ‘Carrot-Stick’ interrogation techniques could have suspects agreeing to return substantial parts if not all of their loot. Though the EFCC clearly lacks the power to plea bargain by virtue of Section 13 (2) of the EFCC Act, Section 14 (2) in the typically hilarious fashion in which some of our laws are drafted, allows them to compound (agree for a consideration not to prosecute) any offence punishable under the Act by accepting any sum of money as they deem fit exceeding the maximum amount to which that person would have been liable if he had been convicted of that offence.

In as much as I agree that a lot of corrupt politicians and government officials have looted us dry and would want to see formidable cases built against them, there is also a need to thread wisely and exploit other means where nothing we have on them will stick.

It would be most painful to watch our thieving leaders set free by the courts to go and enjoy their loot when we had a chance of recovering most of it. A treadmill war is as good as lost.

——————

Op-ed pieces and contributions are the opinions of the writers only and do not represent the opinions of Y!/YNaija

Umar Sa’ad Hassan is a lawyer based in Kano. He tweets @alaye26 and an be contacted via [email protected]

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

cool good eh love2 cute confused notgood numb disgusting fail