Chief of Defence Staff, Olonisakin risks jail term after failing to comply with court order

Having disobeyed an order of the Industrial Court, Chief of Defense Staff, Gabriel Olonisakin, now risks jail term.

The court in it’s judgement delivered by Edith Agbakoba in Abuja on June 21, ordered him to provide, within 10 days, evidence of transmitting the appeal of a controversially dismissed officer to President Muhammadu Buhari for redress, as the law stipulates.

However, Premium Times reports that showed the order had not been carried out, and the Defence spokesperson, John Enenche, did not also confirm compliance.

Citing Olonisakin’s disobedience to the order, the judgement creditor, Abdulfatai Mohammed, on Friday, approached the industrial court to summon the military chief to give reason(s) he should not be committed to prison for “contempt of court”.

Mohammed, was compulsorily retired from the Army in June 2016 alongside 37 others, most of who were forced out of service in manners that contravened rules of disengagement in the armed forces.

Most of them did not face any panel or probe as stipulated by law. They were also neither indicted nor queried for any offence.

In keeping with the redress window accorded him by the military rules, Mohammed had on June 20, 2016 petitioned President Muhammadu Buhari to demand justice.

According to Paragraph 09.02(e) of the Harmonized Terms and Conditions of Service for Officers, 2012 (revised), any officer compulsorily retired or dismissed can appeal to the President through the Chief of Defence Staff within 30 days.

However, as no response came from the Presidency, Mohammed approached the Industrial Court last year to seek an order, compelling Olonisakin to transmit his petition to the President and show evidence of that action.

Although, court documents show the military had tendered a July 2016 letter to Buhari, appearing to convey the petitions of 22 officers, including Mohammed, the correspondence had no stamp marking it as “received” by the Presidency.

Consequently, the court ruled on June 21 that the Chief of Defense Staff was “duty-bound to show evidence that Mr. Mohammed’s petition was delivered within 10 days of the judgment.”

According to the Notice of Motion on “Committal for Contempt”, served on Olonisakin on Friday, the sacked officer’s counsel, Abdul Mohammed, said that Olonisakin “fully participated in the proceedings and even up to the final decision.”

“Despite receiving the said of order of court and having knowledge of the order, the respondents have refused to obey order of the court.

“It is in the interest of justice to commit the respondent for refusal to obey lawful order of the court,” the lawyer said.

The parties are now expecting court to communicate date for proceedings to commence.

Mohammed and the 37 other affected officers have petitioned Acting President Yemi Osinbajo, accusing military authorities of bias and injustice.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

cool good eh love2 cute confused notgood numb disgusting fail