by Akan Ido

Not minding the support expressed by the National Assembly for the proscription of  two Islamic militant groups, Boko Haram and Ansaru by the Federal Government, prominent Northern leaders have faulted the ban saying it has disrupted their efforts at stopping the orgy of violence fomented by these groups.

According to reports, the Arewa Consultative Forum and the Northern Elders Forum said with the proscription they are waiting to see the FG’s next line of action at combating the terrorist organisations’ excesses.

Read the Punch Newspapers report below:

To the ACF and the NEF, the Jonathan administration has through the ban thrown a spanner in the works in its efforts to  end   bloodletting in the North  through amnesty for Boko Haram and Ansaru members.

They said they were waiting to see  how the Federal Government would address the  crisis in the North.

In an interview with one of our correspondents in Kaduna, the  ACF’s National Publicity Secretary, Mr. Anthony Sani, argued that with the ban, negotiations with Boko Haram would be difficult.

He asked, “Now that they (government) have proscribed the sect, can they now negotiate with a non-existing group?

“Before, the government told us that  it was  using  a stick and carrot approach; that is, negotiation and state of emergency; now that they  have proscribed it (Boko Haram), how will the negotiation work?

“It is the government that told us that  a stick and carrot approach will work together. Now that they have gone to proscribe  Boko Haram, let us see how they will  apply  the stick and carrot. We pray that they succeed.”

Sani wondered if the government would negotiate with members of the sect individually instead of meeting the group.

He added,  “The government said they  needed the emergency in order to reclaim  the seized  town taken over by Boko Haram. This made  Nigerians, including  us (ACF)  to give them the go-ahead. We supported the state of emergency to reclaim seized part  of the country.

“But now that they have proscribed the sect, we don’t know how they will apply the carrot. Now, how can you negotiate with an   illegal entity? The group has just been proscribed. They have announced it. They are applying the stick now but we don’t know how they will apply the carrot.”

His counterpart in the NEF,  Prof. Ango Abdullahi, said the  proscription contradicted  government’s efforts to negotiate with the sect.

Abdullahi argued  that the proscription of anything should come after the legal existence of such a thing.

He added,   “As far as I can understand,   if there  is an organisation registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission and is operating according to the law before it was registered; and then along the line, the organisation begins to infringe on the laws that created it or even against its laws as registered with the Corporate Affairs Commission, you can then go ahead and cancel its registration.

“If its activities are violating the law of the country,  then issues like banning and proscription come into play.

“But in this case, people say they don’t know what this Boko Haram is, they don’t know the members and they are trying to get the members to come out for dialogue .

“If you are looking for dialogue, you have to expect that there will be people who will come out under certain respectable conditions.

“Two   things  have happened simultaneously-  the declaration of a  state of emergency which connotes the declaration of martial law. You cannot expect somebody to come and meet soldiers under emergency conditions and now you have the proscription.”

Apart from the ACF  and NEF, the Northern Youth Consultative Forum,   a former Lagos State Police Commissioner, Abubakar Tsav, and the Campaign for Democracy  flayed the ban.

Alhaji Aminu Mohammed, the NYCF President said it was unfortunate that the FG appears to be playing politics with the sect saying it is difficult to trust a government that acts this way.

Mohammed, who  expressed concern about the planned amnesty for Boko Haram members, said  it was unfortunate  that all along,  the Jonathan administration had been playing politics with the sect.

He said,  “We are all intelligent. You cannot create many  things at the same time: Boko Haram, amnesty committee,  fighting insurgents and proscribing the group.

“How do we trust the government? Is it not the government that is messing things up? Let them tell us who Boko Haram is? Where are they?”

On  his part, Tsav  asked, “Is this ban an Act of National Assembly or a decree by the President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Nigeria, Dr Goodluck Ebele Jonathan?

“Why did the President not include MEND(Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta), NDVF (Niger Delta Volunteer Force), OPC (Odua People’s Congress), Ombatse, etc in the ban since these organisations also engage in acts of terrorism?

“Was Boko Haram a legal   organisation before the ban?   He(President) just sleeps, dreams and acts on his dreams without thinking. Laws are made for all but GEJ’s law is discriminatory and with ethnic bias.

“This is civilian dictatorship and not democracy. What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.”

Also, Okei-Odumakin said the ban was meaningless.

She asked, “What is the use of government outlawing a group that had already declared that it was the Federal Government that should beg  it for amnesty?

“It is meaningless and preposterous. The Boko Haram would laugh  it off as a joke. What the government needs to do is to enforce law and order.”

Is spite of the knocks from the ACF, NEF, N Y C F, CD and Tsav, Jonathan got a  strong backing from the National Assembly which said it would stand behind him in any action that would end insurgency in the country.

  Senate Spokesman, Enyinnaya Abaribe, while briefing journalists on Wednesday, said, “The Senate welcomes the proscription of Boko Haram and other terrorist groups in the country. Although it is coming late, it is good and we will continue to support the President’s efforts to bring peace to the country.”

He clarified that the proclamation would not affect the amnesty plans, arguing that amnesty was for those who renounced their participation in  terrorist activities.

Abaribe said, “Those who are still continuing with terrorism are not covered by the amnesty.”

 Chairman, House Committee on Media and Public Affairs, Mr. Zakari Mohammed, said, “The prescription order is a step in the right direction. As a House, we will support every proactive measure taken by the Federal Government to stem the tide of insecurity in the country.

“Whenever the government makes a pronouncement that is good, we will support it as a House.”