The United States loves its role as the World’s police- well until Trump who touts MAGA any chance he can get. That did not stop him from tossing 59 missiles in Syria, did it.
The US-Iran relations were warm until 1953 when the CIA organised a military coup that overthrew Mohammed Mossadeq.
Since then, the two countries have maintained a frosty relationship. Recently, Trump put Iran on the “no fly”list and issued additional sanctions. Sanctions that are far reaching.
Natasha takes a stand against the world’s police meddling in Iran.
So Iran's temperature hit 127 degrees yesterday.
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
Iran's economy, of course, has been completely destroyed by American sanctions; tens of thousands of homeless people *sleep in graves* and
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
food scarcity is so intense that there have been riots over access to chicken. (We used to be one of the world's wealthier countries.)
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
It's been *years* and I'm still haunted by an American politician saying airstrikes might be more ethical than sanctions, because airstrikes
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
would only kill "a couple thousand" innocent Iranians. (There's apparently no option c, don't bomb OR starve innocent Iranians. ¯_(ツ)_/¯)
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
And now on top of that global warming has hit the point where it is actively dangerous for Iranians to be anywhere but in air conditioning,
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
which most Iranians can't afford because everything I just said.
And the world's biggest contributor of global warming is stripping away
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
the very few things it was doing to mitigate that.
I'm terrified but I'm also fucking furious.
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
The worst part is Iran got the "nice" sanctions, unlike the Iraqi sanctions which killed (zero exaggeration) hundreds of thousands of kids.
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
This is what Middle Eastern kids grow up seeing. American politicians saying "maybe it would be nicer to bomb them than starve them" and
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
"killing 500,000 kids was worth the cost" (killing 500,000 kids was defended Madeleine Albright in 1996; the sanctions kept right on going
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
Again, there's no "don't kill" option. The question is just do we kill them with sanctions, kill them with bombs, or kill them with drones?
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
Meanwhile the US Navy has REPEATEDLY called global warming a threat to our security, but why stop global warming when you can kill people.
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
…but like, "they" hate us because "they hate freedom," right? I mean, what other reason could there possibly be?
— Natasha Razi (@swingingstorm) July 1, 2017
Reactions:
Isn't Iran, right now, spending millions to fight proxy wars with the Israelis, and Saudis. Why do "they" hate them?
— Robert George (@RobertCinci) July 2, 2017
Um, b/c Israel helps the U.S. imperialize the region by attacking other nations, & Saudis spread Wahabism and terrorism have bomb civilians?
— MindForged (@MindForgedOne) July 2, 2017
I mean if you literally just ignore shat these nations actually do, you can ask these rhetorical "gotchas", but that's an easy game to play.
— MindForged (@MindForgedOne) July 2, 2017
That's the point. Most states act in the same ways, and can tell righteous stories like the one above.
— Robert George (@RobertCinci) July 2, 2017
Did Iran overthrow our Democratically elected government and install a brutal dictator to get our oil?
— ? Bernielab 2020 ? (@SnarkCage) July 2, 2017
If not, maybe you should stop this deeply intellectually dishonest false equivalency game.
— ? Bernielab 2020 ? (@SnarkCage) July 2, 2017
Hell, it would be nice if you could at least tell a coherent story. Mossadegh's oil nationalization helped the US at the UK's expense.
— Robert George (@RobertCinci) July 2, 2017
British sanction over the move destabilized Mossadegh's government, and he turned to communists to help him battle the Shah.
— Robert George (@RobertCinci) July 2, 2017
That's when we sided with the Brits. Because our fear of the USSR Trump'd oil companies political power.
— Robert George (@RobertCinci) July 2, 2017
And if you think the US didn't have a righteous story about its struggle with the Soviets you aren't paying attention.
— Robert George (@RobertCinci) July 2, 2017
Like us, I'm sure the victims of Shah's CIA-trained secret police SAVAK would find your trenchant geopolitical analysis quite compelling pic.twitter.com/iuN0PDkVAR
— ? Bernielab 2020 ? (@SnarkCage) July 3, 2017
Unless my memory is terrible, I didn't contest the Shah's brutality, just that his installation wasn't about US access to oil.
— Robert George (@RobertCinci) July 3, 2017
Hi Trump, your memo.
Reformed social media monitoring spirit
Leave a reply