Days later, Tameka showed her displeasement by vowing to appeal the judge’s ruling and filed a motion for a new trial.
According to TMZ, she wanted to prove that the judge was making the ruling as a bias in Usher’s favor.
The site reports:
Tameka claims the judge has a strong tie to Usher’s lawyer, claiming the attorney was personally responsible for nearly half of the contributions to the judge’s re-election campaign in 2008.
What’s more … Tameka alleges Usher’s lawyer served on the judge’s re-election campaign committee.
Tameka also insists NO evidence was presented showing she couldn’t take care of her kids.
Tameka also claims there was clear evidence of Usher’s “past, current, and future inability” to care for the kids.
The site also reports that the judge has not ruled on her motion yet, but more details will emerge soon.
Last week, it was reported that Tameka was also confused to why her ex-husband received custody when he has such a hectic work schedule.