Lai Mohammed has a detailed explanation for critics of $1bn security fund

The Federal Government has described those criticising the approval of $1bn for the fight against insurgency and other violent crimes in the country as uninformed and partisan.

Minister of Information, Culture and Tourism, Lai Mohammed at a news conference in Lagos.

Background:

Ekiti governor, Ayodele Fayose had kicked against the approval by governors, stating that the money will be used to fund President Muhammadu Buhari’s re-election.

Akwa Ibom governor, Udom Emmanuel also criticised the $1bn approval. He stated that the President was not giving Niger Delta the same attention.

What Mohammed said:

The minister said the fund was not meant for fight against Boko Haram alone but also tackle kidnapping, cattle rustling, illegal oil bunkering and other crimes.

He said the critics were taking it too far by making the security of the country politics.

“There has been an unnecessary, uninformed and highly-partisan criticism of the one billion dollars which was recently approved by the Nigeria Governors Forum for the military to tackle the security challenges facing the country, including Boko Haram, illegal oil bunkering, kidnapping and cattle rustling.

“I said unnecessary and uninformed because everyone knows the role the military is playing in helping to tackle the numerous security crisis facing the states, much less the war against Boko Haram.

“The fact that Boko Haram has been largely degraded does not mean the war is over. As we have said times without number, asymmetric wars like the one against Boko Haram do not end with an armistice.

“It is, therefore, curious that some of those who have criticised the $1bn approval have hinged their argument on the fact that the Boko Haram has been degraded.

“Perhaps also, the critics do not know that fighting an asymmetric war is costlier than fighting a conventional war. In any case, wars, especially the war against terror, are never fought with budgetary provisions.

“It is common knowledge that the annual budgetary allocation to the military is not commensurate with the internal security challenges we face, for which we have had to continuously rely on the military to assist the police and the Civil Defence Corps.

“When insurgents take over a chunk of our nation’s territory, we turn to the military. When the farmers/herders clash escalate, we turn to the military. When kidnappers up their game, we turn to the military, when illegal bunkerers and pipeline vandals are seeking to overwhelm our oil production and export, we turn to the military.

“When ethnoreligious clashes occur, we turn to the military. But when it is time to give the military the resources it needs to function, we say it is a waste of scarce resources.

“We come up with spurious reasons to deny the military its due.

“The Nigeria Governors Forum acted wisely in approving the withdrawal of one billion dollars from the Excess Crude Account to fight Boko Haram and other security challenges in the country.

“The one billion dollars is not too much to fight our security challenges. Afterall, security of lives and property is at the core of the existence of any government, and the NGF understands this quite well, going by its action in approving the withdrawal from the ECA”, he said.

What we think:

The explanation by the minister is well-detailed and convincing enough to have critics rethink their position on the matter.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published.

cool good eh love2 cute confused notgood numb disgusting fail