Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has said Nigeria can be restructured in six months.

Abubakar said this while delivering a lecture on ‘Restructuring Nigeria’ at the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, on Wednesday.

He said the Federal Government does not need to amend the constitution before commencing the restructuring of the country.

He said, “Some of what my ideas of restructuring involve require constitutional amendment; some do not. Take education and roads for instance. The Federal Government can immediately start the process of transferring federal roads to the state governments along with the resources it expends on them.

“In the future if the Federal Government identifies the need for a new road that would serve the national interest, it can support the affected states to construct such roads, and thereafter leave the maintenance to the states, which can collect tolls from road users for the purpose.

[Read Also: ATIKU DESCRIBES THE JUNE 12 EXPERIENCE AS “UNFORGETTABLE” (READ)]

“The Federal Government does not need a constitutional amendment to start that process.

“The same goes for education and health care.  We must reverse the epidemic of federal take-over of state and voluntary organisations’ schools and hospitals which began in the 1970s, and also transfer those established by the Federal Government to the states.

“We do not need a constitutional amendment to transfer federal universities and colleges as well as hospitals to the states where they are located.

“The country can be restructured in six months, all you have to do is return the items on the concurrent list to the states,” he added.

Atiku noted that it was not abnormal for Nigerians to have different positions on restructuring because “it is a concept that means different things to different people.”

[Read Also: ATIKU BLASTS NORTHERN, SOUTH-EAST GROUPS OVER STATEMENTS]

“To me, restructuring means making changes to our current federal structure so it comes closer to what our founding leaders established, in response to the very issues and challenges that led them to opt for a less centralised system.

“It means devolving more powers to the federating units with the accompanying resources. It means greater control by the federating units of the resources in their areas.

“It would mean, by implication, the reduction of the powers and roles of the Federal Government so that it would concentrate only on those matters that could best be handled by the centre such as defence, foreign policy, monetary and fiscal policies, immigration, customs and excise, aviation as well as setting and enforcing national standards on such matters as education, health and safety,” he said.